The Invincible Secret Weapon

The Invincible Weapon is guerilla warfare.

In any war, the big problem is not the invasion, it is the occupation.

In the 1960’s and 70’s the most powerful army in the world, USA, was beaten by a bunch of rice farmers armed mostly with light shoulder weapons.

In 1994, in Somalia, they were beaten again by small bands of militia armed again with light shoulder weapons.

In the 1980’s Russian armed forces were beaten by primitive Afghan tribesmen armed with light shoulder weapons. And again in 1996 they were defeated by Chechens armed with light shoulder weapons.

Guerillas prevent occupation.

The guerilla operates on the principle that a soldier cannot shoot what it cannot find.

And the guerilla is not much interested in killing privates or corporals. They want Generals and Colonels and if they are not on the field, they will take out Majors, Captains and Lieutenants. In other words, they’ll take out the highest ranking leader on the field. And he has no intention of making his move unless he can do it and slip away quickly and quietly.

Here’s an example scenario: In the woods near an enemy base, he places a mortar in a hole. He aims the mortar at the enemy’s headquarters or barracks, then fills in the hole so that the muzzle of the mortar is exactly level with the ground. He places a flat rock over the muzzle, scatters some leaves for camouflage, then goes home.

A couple of months later under the cover of darkness he goes back to the mortar hole and drops six mortar rounds, replaces the rock, and goes home.

A few months later he does it again, and then again and again…

That’s guerilla warfare. Hit and run.

An occupation army needs to have a different mental and emotional makeup then an invasion army.

An invasion army requires well equipped expert warriors who can punch through the enemy’s defenses and establish bases for the occupation forces.

An occupation army needs to be made up of cold-blooded homicidal maniacs.

Should America ever be “invaded” it’s going to be by UN troops or other foreign troops allowed in through a porous border over the course of several years as illegal immigrants.

Our own armed forces will need to be emasculated or indoctrinated as communist sympathizers. [SOUND FAMILIAR?]

The only way to kill guerillas is to kill everyone.

Think Lt. William Calley, My Lai, Vietnam. 500 men, women and children were massacred by American troops out of frustration.

Six decades before Vietnam, during the early conquest of the Philippines, American General Jacob Smith, out of frustration at being unable to defeat ill-equipped Philippine guerillas, ordered the killing of any and all men, women and children our troops could find.  220,000 men, women and children were slaughtered.

The only way to defeat guerillas is to kill everyone.

If we ever get into this situation, remember this if you need a boost of ruthlessness.

The person now occupying the WH in 2022 has said that patriots would be no match against F-14’s. [remember when he threatened Trump supporters if we ever thought of fighting back?]

In Vietnam, a country smaller than California, US aircraft dropped three times the tonnage of bombs that were dropped in all of WWII on it during the course of our conflict – which we lost.

That comes out to 1,000 pounds of explosives for every man, woman and child in the country.

The ONLY way to win a guerilla war is through ethnic cleansing.

  1. The political ideology in power would have to identify who the “ethnic” guerillas or potential guerillas were.
  2. They would then have to either
  3. Convince the masses of the evilness of this “ethnic” group. [We unvaxxed already know how easy this is] so there would be no public outcry.
  4. Employ foreign troops or mercenaries.

In the past, I would not be at all concerned about our own government being this evil, but times have changed and Satan now has this Democrat Party by the cahoonas.

By-the way: The rule of thumb among military experts is that conventional troops need a minimum six-to-one numerical superiority over guerillas. Some even go as high as ten-to-one, in addition to helicopters and all other technological advantages.

In Vietnam, it took three B-52’s and 80 tons of bombs to kill one guerilla while it only took one guerilla with a $300 hunting (sniper) rifle to keep a whole battalion of Marines tied up for days.

General Eisenhower estimated that 2,800 French guerillas were worth 15 infantry divisions. A division is 5,000 to 10,000 troops.

In 1998, the Turkish government had 200,000 regular troops committed to fighting 1,200 Kurdish guerillas.

Incidentally, this is why our Founding Fathers included the Second Amendment.

They knew that the most effective defense is the one that focuses on making the country difficult to occupy by enemies – foreign or domestic.

  

The Swiss Defense System:

Switzerland has the best track record of staying out of wars.

How have they done this?

In Switzerland, a man joins the militia at age 20 and remains until age 50. [A militia is all able-bodied adult males of good character]

Each militia member trains regularly, keeps his rifle and ammunition in his home ready at a moment’s notice.

They are trained to be snipers.

Marksmanship is a national sport in Switzerland.

There is a Swiss saying: “Switzerland does not have an army; Switzerland is an army. It is an entire nation of Minutemen.”

 

Strategic Guerilla Warfare of Switzerland as Taught to Their Citizens

  • Shoot the highest-ranking leader from a concealed position then disappear.
  • DO NOT engage the enemy in an extended battle.
  • Every Swiss household is required to have a military-style gun and every adult citizen is taught how to use it.

If you will read Federalist Papers number 20, 42, and 43 by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton you will find that our Founding Fathers studied the Swiss System carefully when creating our American system.

The Second and the Tenth Amendments bear the special imprint of Swiss thinking. (one of those thoughts was to STAY OUT of the affairs of other countries, especially wars. Notice that the only president in modern history to follow this line of thinking was Trump)

If America today was still modeled after this Swiss Defense System, we would have a militia-guerilla system of defense 50 million strong. This means an enemy (foreign or domestic) would need, at a minimum, 300 million troops.

Here is the EXACT wording of the Second Amendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The amendment does not give permission for a well-regulated militia; it requires one.  

 The objective of this militia defense system is not to kill the enemy’s troops. It is to kill enemy leaders.  Generals, Colonels or someone higher.  In other words, cut off the head of the snake.

  

I have read all of Richard J. Maybury’s practical books based on historical truth and was the source of most of this essay.

In the 1960’s he was a member of the 605th Air Commando Squadron and worked directly with the CIA’s notorious School of the Americas whose job was to teach anti-guerilla warfare to foreign troops for the likes of Manuel Noriega.

This experience is where he draws upon this knowledge and where he realized the tremendous advantage guerillas have over regular troops.

 

The Second Amendment was not written so that we would have the right to hunt or even defend ourselves.

It was written specifically so that We the People would have the means to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government and even overthrow it if need be.

We The People ARE the Invincible Weapon

Please follow and like us:

Propaganda – from No Reason To Hide by Erwin Lutzer

Live Not by LiesEvery mainstream media outlet and some alternative ones present some form of propaganda.

But generally speaking, it is the left (aka Marxist progressives) who are in control of the narrative.

Leftist news outlets and politicians’ goal is to make us weary of standing up against their bizarre ideas of sexuality, race, and justice.

If they can cause us to lose heart, they know it will be easier to get us to submit and tell ourselves “The wolf is at the door; just let him in.”

But, before we resign ourselves to giving up, we must understand that the battle is often won or lost through an assault on words which is ultimately a war on ideas.

The radical Marxist left wants to use words not just to win the debate but to cancel debate altogether.

They want to destroy the influence of those who disagree with them. They want to use propaganda to limit and control our thoughts

(Aka)Gaslighting:

The purpose of propaganda is to reshape peoples worldview (views of reality) by redefining reality.

The long-term goal is always about power.

The ultimate goal is to make them obedient to the dictates of a leader or group of elites who tell us they are committed to “what is best for the people.”

Eventually, people will suspend their judgment, set aside what they know to be true, and join the “masses”. i.e. Herd instinct.

Propaganda makes lies credible.

When we are not open to the possibility of being wrong, propaganda is more readily able to accomplish its purpose.

Jesus repeatedly said, “He who has ears to hear, let hear” (Matthew 11:15). He was saying that there is no one as deaf as someone whose heart is not open to truth.

George Orwell wrote Nineteen Eighty-four after spending time pondering the rise of communist Russia and Hitler’s chilling control of Germany.

The Encyclopedia Britannica summarizes the book 1984 in this way:

Its depiction of a state where daring to think differently is rewarded with torture, where people are monitored every second of the day, and where party propaganda trumps free speech and thought is a sobering reminder of the evils of unaccountable governments.

To do this, lies must be sweetened to make them easier to swallow.

Humans do not always need words for feelings, but we do need them for thought, especially complex thought. And that is why Big Brother is at war with language. He wants to make it less useful for examining ideas by reducing the power of words to the barest expressions. Newspeak is his tool for keeping his subjects permanently inarticulate.

Word control is intended to bring about thought control.

Aldous Huxley, in his book Brave New World, described a totalitarian state:

A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors, and schoolteachers.

The goal is for people to love their servitude and accept the controlling narrative, which is designed to limit what they say and what they are allowed to think.

Isaiah wrote in Scripture: “Woe to those who call evil good”.  You can only call evil good if you rename the evil; to say it differently, good words must be used to camouflage the evil. But, to call evil good is only half the task; the other half is to call that which is good evil. Language must be manipulated to accomplish this.

In a nutshell, Propaganda is telling people what they want to hear, then giving them what you want to have. The goal is to make a lie to appear to be true. Also known as gaslighting.

To paraphrase Voltaire, “Those who can make you believe the bizarre can make you commit atrocities,” And if people can be made to believe a lie, they will live as if the lie were the truth.

George Orwell called this verbal sleight of hand Newspeak.

A revolution can be brought about only when you have slogan that is hard to speak against (and of course you need an enemy to hate). Slogans like Climate Change, Black Lives Matter, Social Justice… They all sound like something everyone can and should support, but when you unpack what they really mean you discover it involves the restructuring or more accurately deconstructing the whole order of society.

Take social justice. When you unpack what it really is all about is gender identity, Critical Race Theory, socialism and equity.

Propagandists are very adept at slogans. They say one thing but really mean another.

When Hitler starved children he called it “putting them on a low-calorie diet.”  Killing Jews was “cleansing the land,” and euthanasia was “a compassionate use of medical therapy.”

Remember: Propaganda is telling people what they want to hear, then giving them what you want to have.

The radical Progressive Left does not use language to describe reality, but rather to create a “reality” they want you to believe and accept.

Orwell wrote in his book 1984, “War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.”

In this same book, Mr. Winston was expected to say 2 + 2 = 5, it was not so much an attempt to convince him of this, but rather, to get him accustomed to speaking lies and doubting his own judgment. If he could speak lies, he could live by lies.   Remember Common Core?  How many of our children have been brainwashed by this lie (not to mention their parents as well?

Big Brother’s goal is a population so dependent on the government it is willingly controlled.

Do you remember during the George Floyd riots seeing a reporter with burning cars and buildings in the background, saying that the demonstrations were “largely peaceful.” So riots can be described as “peaceful,” looting is “redistributive justice,” and those who break the law to enter the US are not illegal immigrants but “undocumented workers.”  And a criminal is “a person who has issues with the law,” which implies the real culprit is the law itself.

The left is using words to attempt to reorder reality when they tell us “That man you see competing in sports is actually a woman.”

The university that will not allow a conservative to speak on campus does so in the name of tolerance. And the mother who kills her unborn child is simply making a healthcare decision.

They tell us drag queens are artists who should be welcomed to libraries to speak to children. “Drag is art,” writes Jaden Amos, who reports for NPR.

When the goal of language is not truth but ideology and power, the totalitarian state has already arrived.

Many universities and colleges have policies narrowing the realm of permissible speech, reducing students to silence and ultimately ignorance due to a lack of critical thinking skills.

The reason for this madness is NOT to elevate the conversation, but to silence it. The goal is to produce students who graduate with ideological conformity; those who do not comply are intimidated and canceled.

The left is very intolerant of the three C’s that shaped America: Christianity, the Constitution and capitalism.

Research by the Cato Institute reported that nearly half of the students aged 13-22 said they stopped speaking up in the classroom because of the prevailing atmosphere of intolerance and political correctness.

The goal of the Progressive Marxist Left is to imprison the mind. Eventually, people will not be able to object to any radical leftist ideas no matter how bizarre because there will be no vocabulary for doing so; the words will have been banned.

The debate is no longer about ideas, but about bigotry and hate.

The left wants to pass hate speech legislation to shut down the expression of conservative ideas on the pretense that they are hateful and cause harm. In a strange twist of irony, the left will sometimes even justify violence as “free speech.”

Anywhere Communism/Socialism/Marxism has been installed, Gulags and death ALWAYS follow.

Russia used the tactic of labeling dissidents as mentally deranged. In effect the government says, “Challenge our idea, and we will declare you mentally ill and need to be locked away in an insane asylum.”

The radical left says, “You disagree with me? See a therapist.”

In propaganda, ideology controls the “facts” rather than the facts controlling the ideology. Therefore, “facts” are carefully selected to fit the narrative.

Take Canada as an example of our future here in the USA where even true statements can end up being banned. “Not all truthful statements must be free from restriction,” said Canada’s Supreme Court justice Marshall Rothstein.

Propaganda does not just control what is being said, but also what is not being said.

Look at how the media covered the Kyle Rittenhouse story. He was vilified as a racist because he was white (even though the three people he shot defending himself were themselves all white). He was labeled a “white supremacist” and belonged to a militia and “carried a gun across state lines.”  All of which were lies propagated by leftist news media.

Contrast this with the story of Darrell E. Brooks after he deliberately drove his van into people who were celebrating a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin in December 2021 killing six people. Some news outlets never even carried the story and within days it all but vanished from the news.

Rittenhouse shot three people in self-defense; Brooks deliberately killed as many people as he could. But his story died because it could not be exploited for racial or political purposes.

So propaganda does not just control what is being said, but also what is not being said.

Please follow and like us: